Danishova

Idgit Watch

Archive for February, 2009

Michelle Obama’s arms are an inspiration while she acts as nation’s backseat driver, finds time for personal trainer

Posted by danishova on February 28, 2009

Wow. I don’t think we’ve ever had a  First Lady who has faced such daunting tasks and yet carried on so magnificently.

When Obama emerged with uncovered arms on Tuesday, some grumbled about her showing too much skin on an occasion where other women were wearing long sleeves or suits.

Boston Herald columnist Lauren Beckham Falcone wrote to Obama, "It’s February. Going sleeveless in subzero temperature is just showing off. All due respect."

But others were amazed, like 25-year-old Jessie Rosen. After seeing Obama at the speech Tuesday, she went to the Adidas store in New York and bought two five-pound dumbbells. "It was her arms being so toned in spite of her life," she said.

"This woman is redecorating White House, trying to raise two children and backseat driving the nation," Rosen said. "She seems to have time to keep her arms toned, so why can’t I?"

Terrific! We’ve advanced from having an unelected co-President with Hillary Clinton, to an un-elected backseat driver of the whole freaking nation with Michelle Obama.  Gee, I can’t wait until she helps me drive my kid to school and enrolls him in Barack’s Universal Service programs. I’ll be so busy admiring her beautifully toned arms that I won’t notice that she’s just signed my kid up for involuntary servitude.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Blogger giving free investment advice: Wheelbarrows are a safe bet in the era of Obamanomics, as Dictators get ready to pounce.

Posted by danishova on February 26, 2009

Great job, Barack. You promised change and you are delivering beyond our wildest dreams.  On April 1st, those families who don’t have a target on their backs because they make less than $250,000 a year in combined income are getting a candy and gum allowance of $1.09 a day. Yep, this tax cut was the centerpiece of Barack’s campaign to “cut taxes for 95%” of Americans.  Well folks, you better kick your candy habit now because that generous largess is about to be sucked up with hefty increases in your utility bills. The New York Times notes:

Mr. Obama’s blueprint, which will project spending and revenues for the next decade, will flesh out the president’s thinking on his energy plans both to cap the emissions of gases, particularly carbon dioxide, that are blamed for climate change and to spur development of nonpolluting energy alternatives.

The budget will show the government beginning by 2012 to collect billions of dollars in revenues from selling permits to businesses that emit the polluting gases, assuming the president’s energy initiative becomes law as soon as this year, officials said.

Because utilities and other businesses would presumably pass on their costs to customers, Mr. Obama will propose to use most of the government’s revenues from the permits to finance an extension of the new “Making Work Pay” tax credit beyond the two years covered in the $787 billion economic recovery plan that was just enacted.

Every consumer of energy, not just those of us who pay utility bills for our homes, will be paying higher energy bills.  Every business, large and small, will have higher energy bills and everyone of us will pay for it (except “the poor” who no doubt will be given government assistance to cover these increased energy costs). Fair is fair, right?  Add these increased costs to the cost of funding a Socialist health care system and lots of little porky things, and we’re talking H-Y-P-E-R-I-N-F-L-A-T-I-O-N. 

Call me a cynic, but I’m not sure that a 39.6% federal tax rate on “the rich” (and small businesses) will cover these increased costs – even if “the rich” kept toiling away for the greater good of the Federal government.  I’m not a brilliant economist like Professor Obama, but how many couples will quit their jobs rather than have the fruits of their labor robbed from them in order to pay for fantastical illusions like “anthropomorphic climate change”?  Which means that…hold on…revenue to the Treasury will decrease not increase, which means tax increases for every one of us, which ultimately spells… D-I-S-A-S-T-E-R.

But wait! Here’s where my investment advice comes in. I  suggest you go ahead and buy wheelbarrows and even invest in wheelbarrow stock before they are in short supply.  Be sure to inflate their tires correctly because very little bit helps, y’all. 

You see, history tells us that when Germany suffered 4 trillion percent inflation and required wheelbarrows to carry cash to market, the wheelbarrow itself was more valuable than all the currency it carried. But that’s the good news. Here’s the bad news, as recounted in this 1980 story in Time Magazine:

The true danger of any inflation, especially hyperinflation, is that it will ultimately destroy the sinews of society: when money loses its value, the wise spend and speculate, while only fools save and invest. The public turns cynical about government, and everything, especially work, appears meaningless. Describing the impact of runaway inflation in 1791 during the French Revolution, Chronicler Louis Blanc later wrote: "Commerce was dead; betting took its place." History’s great inflations have almost always been followed by a dictator who promised among other things to restore the currency’s value. Napoleon, Hitler and Mao Tse-tung all rode the power on the back of hyperinflation.

Alas, I have no advice about how to prevent dictators from popping up here, there and everywhere, but you’ll be sitting pretty with your wheelbarrow investments, so what do you care? 

UPDATE:

Read this analysis from the W.S.J., and this editorial from the New York Post. I’ve got one word for all of you who bought into Obama’s claim that ‘he won’t raise taxes one dime on families making less than $250,000 a year’ – SUCKERS.

 

UPDATE:

Pay attention to the fact that the vast majority of Obama’s wealth-destroying schemes don’t actually come into effect until after the 2010 Congressional elections (or early enough in 2012, when Obama will be up for re-election).  “95% of Americans” will be blithely unaware that their “tax cut” is a fraud, until it’s too late.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Big spending Senator John Kerry seeks to outlaw “lavish” spending by TARPed banks

Posted by danishova on February 25, 2009

Reuters reports:

Northern Trust Corp took a pounding on Tuesday from U.S. lawmakers who said the bank must repay millions of taxpayer bailout dollars spent on "lavish parties" during a Southern California golf tournament.

The Chicago-based bank’s sponsorship of the expensive bash prompted Sen. John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, to say he will introduce a bill this week to end "extravagant spending practices of U.S. banks" that receive taxpayer bailouts.

"I’m sick and tired of picking up the newspaper and reading about another idiotic abuse of taxpayer money, while our country is on the brink," Kerry said in a statement.

Wow!  Could Senator Kerry be having second thoughts about the “stimulus package”?  Maybe he finally took a moment to read it, after voting in favor of it? Perhaps he disagrees with Sen. Schumer’s claim that Americans don’t care about little porky amendments? How else to explain Kerry’s sudden embrace of responsible spending?  Hey! Maybe Kerry will come to the decidedly unlavish tea parties that are being thrown to protest ‘abuses of taxpayer money’ at various locations all around the country.  Be sure to bring Teresa!

Kerry plans to introduce legislation targeting banks that got taxpayer assistance under the government’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Chicago-based Northern Trust received $1.6 billion under TARP.

Democratic lawmakers in the House of Representatives, led by Barney Frank, chairman of the Financial Services Committee, demanded Northern Trust repay the cost of festivities that surrounded last week’s Northern Trust Open at the Riviera Country Club in Pacific Palisades, California.

"This behavior demonstrates extraordinary levels of irresponsibility and arrogance," wrote Frank and 17 other Democrats in a letter to Northern Trust CEO Frederick Waddell.

Woo Hoo!  Barney Frank is on board too!  Would that would be the same Gamblin’ Barney  Frank who said this at a House Financial Services Committee hearing on Fannie & Freddie  on Sept. 10, 2003?:

I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing. . .

Back to the story:

"This is the second year Northern Trust is sponsoring the Open as part of a five-year contract. The contract was signed in the fall of 2007 — a year before the U.S. government’s Capital Purchase Program (under the TARP) existed."

The bank had a Contract? Who cares?  This is a new dawn, a new day, and there’s a new Sheriff in town.

The bank said it is healthy and did not seek TARP aid, but entered the program at the government’s request. It said TARP "funds are not allocated to operating expenses, including marketing, advertising, corporate sponsorship or charitable activities. These are funded through our normal cash flow."

Asked about Northern Trust’s statement that it did not seek TARP aid, Frank said on a CNBC television business news program: "If they didn’t want the money, and didn’t need the money… then pay the money back."

Who knows? At this rate Kerry and Franks will be demanding that Franklin Raines and Jamie Gorelick repay taxpayers for the gazillions they got from Fannie Mae (after assuring us that everything was just peachy keen) and going on to cook the books so they could collect hefty bonuses ? Surely Congresss will hold hearings about this chapter in the housing fiasco any day now! 

Under Kerry’s legislation, which would take effect on March 1, a TARP recipient could not "host, sponsor, pay for conferences and events and pay for holiday or entertainment events for the year in which they receive TARP funds."

A waiver could be sought under some circumstances. A violation would require a TARP recipient to reimburse the government for the cost of the event and pay a fine.

Jeez, that’s some serious belt-tightening Kerry’s demanding there.  No conferences even?  Oh well, I guess if they call it a “retreat” it might be okay.  Of course, we’ll have to see if “experts” believe it’s constitutional for the Federal Government to dictate the business activities of these private banks in the first place. 

Heck, maybe someone will actually read the legislation this time around.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

How I nearly became a cybercriminal and risked violating US CODE Title 18, 1030.

Posted by danishova on February 22, 2009

Ever since Barack Obama and Joe Biden managed to appropriate a dot.Gov domain at their Change.Gov transition website, I’ve been curious as to how they managed to do this.  I had already read some blog postings, and the Wikipedia page on this topic, and while I’m not a lawyer, I don’t see how their transition qualified, particularly since it was registered as a 501 (c) 4 organization (see bottom of the screenshot I captured months ago) :

Change.Gov is a 501C 4 org

Indeed, while it is perfectly proper for presidential transitions to raise money for the Inaugural and so forth, transitions by previous President-elects in the internet era used a dot.org domain, and thus did not masquerade as official government entities. 

Anyhow, getting back to my brush with the cybercriminality, I proceeded to open the dotgov.gov  page. Titled, Government Domain Registration and Services, it has various tabs: Home, Register, WHOIS, Policy, News, DNSSEC – New!.

The home page has links at the top and bottom. The first one I decided to try was “FAQ” which I figured would answer some frequently asked questions about acquiring a dot.gov domain.  Who knew that this is highly restricted, top secret information?  Click on the FAQ link and you get this scary message:

Warning! Use of this site is restricted!

This computer system is for the use of the United States Government. Unauthorized access, or access which exceeds authorized access is punishable under 18 USC 1030.

Just what are the penalties for venturing one click further into the “FAQ page” or "About GSA”?  Yikes!  A quick read of the law, which relates to Fraud and related activity in connection with computers, indicates they range from 5 years to 20 years in prison and hefty fines

If they determined that my attempt to access frequently asked questions was “espionage” or “counterintelligence” I would imagine that the penalties would be more severe. Hopefully I’d serve my time in a U.S. prison, and not be shipped off to GITMO, although since some of those prisoners were released after less than 5 years, and had a lot of lawyers working for them at no charge, it could be a better option.

You can open the page and see for yourself…if you dare (if anyone wants to charge me with aiding and abetting cybercrime, I plead, not guilty). All 3 links at the bottom of the page put me one step closer to violating the law.  Check out their Security and Privacy Notice? WARNING!; Accessibility Policy? WARNING!; About GSA? WARNING!  Yep, apparently it is a violation of law to learn “About GSA”; the only thing I’ve learned about their “Accessibility Policy” is that access is not part of the policy;  their privacy notice is so private, only government entities know what it is. 

These restrictions pop up regularly as one tries to access various bits of information (did I mention that I feel so much safer knowing that my patriotic tax dollars are being used for such pressing national security issues?).

The good news?  At the WHOIS Tab, I was able to do a search of domain names without ending up in jail. Phew! I looked up Change.Gov, and  learned that it is part of the General Services Administration (which is odd since I don’t see how a 501 C 4 can be part of the GSA).  However, I’ll never know the answer to that particular query since learning about the GSA is …restricted information. 

Unless some lawyer wants to offer their pro-bono services on my behalf, I guess I won’t be clicking on About GSA or FAQ anytime soon. And, alas, the mystery of how the Obama-Biden Transition got a dot.gov domain name shall have to remain a mystery for now.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Blogger announces contest to decipher Obama’s Recovery.Gov numbers

Posted by danishova on February 20, 2009

When it comes to the “Stimulus Package”, President Obama has assured us, “This is your money. You have a right to know where it’s going and how it’s being spent. Learn what steps we’re taking to ensure you can track our progress every step of the way.”

The website states:

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act targets investments towards key areas that will save or create good jobs immediately, while also laying the groundwork for long-term economic growth. The charts and numbers below give you an idea of where the money is going…

My very favorite part is the handy image using cute rainbow-colored balloons which they’ve cleverly called the “investment bubble.jpg” .  That image title alone has enhanced my confidence in the economy!  After a housing bubble, the Obama Administration is now giving us an “investment bubble”!  I can’t wait. Indeed, I think I’ll crack open some bubbly tonight to celebrate.

However, before get in a bubbly mood, I need your help!  As a footnote to the “Investment bubble” we are told:

* Tax Relief – includes $15 B for Infrastructure and Science, $61 B for Protecting the Vulnerable, $25 B for Education and Training and $22 B for Energy, so total funds are $126 B for Infrastructure and Science, $142 B for Protecting the Vulnerable, $78 B for Education and Training, and $65 B for Energy.
State and Local Fiscal Relief – Prevents state and local cuts to health and education programs and state and local tax increases.

Sadly, I’m not an economist like Professor Obama, and thus I am having difficulty adding this up in any way that makes sense to little old me. I really like to be informed of everything this administration is doing, so I thought that maybe some of my readers could make sense of this fun puzzle.

I’m too broke being patriotic and paying taxes to give away cash prizes, but I am only too happy to announce the names of winners and runners-up.  To enter, just leave a comment with your explanation. Thanks in advance!

P.S.  When you’re done doing the math, be sure to “share your recovery story” with the Obama Administration.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Update: Demi Moore’s pledge to free 1 million slaves

Posted by danishova on February 20, 2009

I recently vowed, here at my blog, to assist Demi Moore in her pledge to free 1 million slaves in 5 years.  Well, yesterday I received some exciting news! Apparently Ashton Kutcher will be filming a new movie in Douglasville, Georgia and Demi is expected to be around for the filming.

Since I live in Georgia, this should make it easier for me to get updates on this noble effort.  So far I haven’t gotten any updates from her at all, but L.A. is kinda far from Georgia, so that probably explains it. Anyhoo, I’m thinking that the Douglas County Sentinel or the Atlanta Journal Constitution may want to interview her about this.  This pledge (and others) received oodles of publicity and we’re eager to track their success, right?

I will be sure to watch the local news with interest and will update my blog accordingly.

Stay tuned, y’all!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Has Think Progress’ Amanda Terkel pulled her endorsement of The Employee Free Choice Act – aka “Card Check”?

Posted by danishova on February 20, 2009

Think Progress reports:

Earlier this month, New Orleans’s new congressman Joseph Cao (R) stated that he would vote for the economic recovery package. “I believe that more likely than not, I will vote for it because the 2nd Congressional District needs a stimulus package,” he said. Even on the day of the vote, Cao was telling reporters that he was “leaning yes.”

Joseph Cao is the Republican who replaced replaced Democrat William “freezer” Jefferson in a heavily African-American-Democrat Louisiana district.  Cao’s Wiki page doesn’t bother to mention the $90,000 found in Jefferson’s freezer, and includes this objective analysis about his campaign against Jefferson:

The campaign was characterized by what Jefferson’s campaign called "overly negative" tactics on behalf of Cao’s campaign by outside organizations, such as the National Republican Congressional Committee. References were made to Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s removal of Jefferson from the House Ways and Means Committee and entailed what USA Today termed a "barrage" of automated telephone calls, including from a woman who identified herself as "Katy" and who cited Jefferson’s federal indictment on 16 counts of corruption. In a meeting of African-American ministers, Reverend Samuel Butler claimed the reason was to "disenfranchise" African-American voters, which motivated Cao advisor and former New Orleans City Council member Bryan Wagner to reply: "with Rev. Butler’s imagination, he may want to go to work for Walt Disney."

Yep, Cao’s tactics and those of the NRCC sure sound scandalous to me. How dare they make reference to the fact that he was removed from the House Ways and Means Committee! That was a private arrangement between Madame Speaker and William Jefferson, and the public has no right to know this stuff.  Moreover, using robo-calls to inform voters of Jefferson’s 16 count-indictment is so unfair and prejudicial.

Anyhoo, Amanda Terkel believes that Cao was bullied into voting against the ‘stimulus’:

In the end, however, Cao succumbed to GOP arm-twisting and voted against the package. The Republican party’s chief deputy whip stood near the freshman lawmaker during the entire vote, and Cao admitted that the leaders had applied some “pressure” on him to vote no, so that they could boast 100 percent opposition from their party.

She goes on to note:

BayouBuzz.com reports that many of Cao’s constituents are now angry and may launch a recall petition:

Congressman Joseph “Anh”Cao, a Republican, who defeated William “Bill” Jefferson is facing a recall petition because of his vote on the Barack Obama stimulus package. The recall has been initiated by a group of ministers. […]

One elected official, State Representative Juan A. LaFonta, Democrat of District 96 told Bayoubuzz that he does not know about the existence of the petition but that he would sign it. … People are starving and Cao needs to represent the people of the district”, LaFonta said.

Hmmmm.   I wonder if the aforementioned Rev. Samuel Butler is among those ministers.  Bayoubuzz doesn’t name names. But I digress…

I infer that since Think Progress bemoans “arm-twisting”, and the physical presence of congressional whips overseeing a vote, that she joins George McGovern and opposes the “The Employee Free Choice Act” (“Card Check”) which eliminates the secret union ballot.  This would represent a change in position for Ms. Terkel who had this to say in opposition to McCain’s campaign promise to veto EFCA:

Despite McCain’s claim, the EFCA preserves workers’ rights to secret balloting. However, it also gives workers the option to form a union through a “card-check” system, in which a union would be recognized if a majority of workers signed a petition testifying to their desire to organize.

She concluded her defense of Card Check by making this analogy:

McCain’s indignation that organizers may go to people’s homes to persuade them to vote a certain way also seems odd. Perhaps he will be pulling his door-to-door canvassing operation as well?

Yes – it’s exactly the same thing, Amanda!  Everyone knows that we can now vote in Federal elections right at our doorstep when a campaign volunteer shows up, and don’t need to bother with those pesky private voting booths any more.

You go girl!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

RECOVERY.Gov to reveal the names of my bailed-out neighbors; Blogger to prepare Welcome Baskets

Posted by danishova on February 18, 2009

Thank you Barack!!  Once your very generous plans to distribute $75 Billion in “mortgage relief” is put in effect, it looks like I’ll be able to find out which of my neighbors receive bailout funds from you. I mean us.  I mean me.  Sweet! 

From the RECOVERY.Gov website:

Accountability and Transparency

This is your money. You have a right to know where it’s going and how it’s being spent. Learn what steps we’re taking to ensure you can track our progress every step of the way.  The President has made it clear that every taxpayer dollar spent on our economic recovery must be subject to unprecedented levels of transparency and accountability.

This is my favorite of the 5 benefits that are highlighted:

[It “ensures” that ] the recipients and uses of all recovery funds are transparent to the public, and that the public benefits of these funds are reported clearly, accurately, and in a timely manner;

I’m feeling mighty neighborly right now, so I think I’ll prepare some darling  welcome basketsWelcome to My Bailout” Baskets for my bailed-out neighbors.  As inspiration, I like this handy dandy, hang the basket on a doorknob concept – with the sweet card which says, Enjoy Your Stay.

How can I afford this, you may ask? That’s easy!  Starting in June I will be getting $7.09 a week from the President. I will donate those funds to prepare these baskets.  Before you pat me on the back for my generosity, know that I was trying to kick my candy and gum habit anyway so this is actually a selfish gesture on my part.

As for my money going to help bail out my neighbors, I’m only too happy to do it.  It’s my son who’s going to pay for this in the long run, so what do I care, as long as we finally reach Utopia?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

California to proceed with layoffs; press struggling to report the correct numbers

Posted by danishova on February 17, 2009

We have this from the Los Angeles Times:

Legislature adjourns with no budget; governor prepares to lay off 10,000

Reporting from Sacramento — With lawmakers still unable to deliver a budget after three days of intense negotiations, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger prepared to lay off 10,000 government workers and his administration said it would halt the last 275 state-funded public works projects still in operation.

Yet we get this report from Reuters:

With no budget, California to cut 20,000 state jobs

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – California, which is on the brink of running out of cash, will notify 20,000 state workers on Tuesday their jobs may be eliminated, a spokesman for Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said on Monday.

Perhaps these news organizations are struggling with paying their phone bills. In more prosperous times they would have been able to call the Governor’s office and get a clarification but now everyone’s broke and thus relying on two tin cans and a piece of string to communicate. Who can blame them for getting a muddled message under such trying circumstances? 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Obama’s overtures fail to woo “angry, old” McCain; Spurned Dems lash out in anger

Posted by danishova on February 15, 2009

Maybe Barack needs to send McCain a dozen roses and some perfume or something.   According to HuffPo:

Democrats are growing increasingly frustrated with the brash political attacks Sen. John McCain has launched against Barack Obama in the weeks since the new president took office. No one expected the Arizona Republican to be a legislative ally for this administration. But it was widely assumed that Obama’s overtures to McCain in the weeks after the election would dull some of the hard feelings between the two. Now, they are realizing, it has not.

"He is bitter and really angry," Bob Shrum said of McCain in an interview on Friday. "He is angry at the press, which he thinks is unfair. He is angry at Obama and angry at the voters. He has gone from being an angry old candidate to being an angry old defeated candidate."

I guess I can’t blame an angry Shrum for being angry at an angry McCain.

Indeed, during the debate over the economic stimulus package it was McCain, as often as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who spearheaded the opposition. The Arizona Republican denounced the proposal as pure pork on the Senate floor and introduced an alternative measure comprised nearly entirely of tax cuts.

On Sunday, McCain wouldn’t let the fight die, even with the legislation through Congress. Appearing on CNN, he described the $787 billion measure as "generational theft" and said that the bill’s authors should "start over now and sit down together."

Meanwhile, appearing on ABC’s This Week, Sen. Lindsey Graham — McCain’s chief ally in the Senate — said of the process by which the stimulus was forged: "If this is going to be bipartisanship, the country is screwed."

That two Republicans Senators who consider themselves prudent compromisers would forcefully condemn the president’s top legislative priority is noteworthy in and of itself. That it comes after President Obama made overt gestures of reconciliation to both McCain and Graham raises questions as to just how long it will take for this era of post-partisanship to arrive.

I feel sorry for Barack.  It must be tough to suffer from unrequited love.  Just think how tough things will get when he tries to woo the Iranians and has his heart broken by Achmadinijead and the Mullahs.

Not to mention that, as other observers pointed out, McCain isn’t being entirely consistent. [ed.- I count 1 observer in the singular, but why nitpick]

"During the Senate debate, 36 of the Senate Republicans voted for an alternative that would have cut taxes over the next decade by $2.5 trillion, [and] reduced the top marginal race to 25 percent," said the Atlantic’s Ron Brownstein on "Meet the Press." "For John McCain — who voted for that alternative of a $2.5 trillion tax cut over the next decade — to talk about generational theft, I mean, pot meet kettle."

Huh.  I guess I need to brush up on my economics to get up to speed in the Age of Obama.  I recently learned that paying taxes is “patriotic” and we all have to “sacrifice” but I didn’t realize that cutting marginal tax rates is a form of theft.  I’ve always thought that paying confiscatory taxes is a form of theft, but I forgot that we are all Socialists now. My bad.

I’m so glad we have a new President I can believe in to set me straight!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »